fbpx
logo
Call Us : 623.551.5457
Menu ▼▲
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Testimonials
  • Attorneys
    • Sam Crump
    • Nichole Oblinger
  • Practice Areas
    • Bankruptcy
      • Chapter 7
      • Chapter 13
      • Short Sales
      • Foreclosures
    • Business & Corporate Law
      • Disputes
      • Corporate Counseling
      • Business Formation
      • Contract Law
      • E-Commerce Law
      • Franchises
    • Civil Litigation
    • Family Law
      • Divorce
      • Child Support
      • Child Custody
      • Marriage
    • Real Estate Law
    • Probate & Estate
    • Personal Injury
    • Construction Law
    • Insurance Defense
  • Resources
    • Articles
    • Blog
    • FAQs
      • Family Law
      • Search and Seizure
      • Foreclosure
      • Drunk Driving, DUI & DWI
      • Divorce Meditation
      • Arrests and Interrogations
      • Alimony
  • Contact

Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007

The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 was signed into law by President Bush on December 20, 2007. The purpose of the Act is primarily to exclude “discharges of indebtedness” on qualified principal residences from one’s gross income. Generally, a “qualified principal residence” is a home where the individual resided for two out of the past five years.

The Act creates a three-year window for homeowners to refinance, or receive debt forgiveness on their home loan while paying no taxes on any forgiven debt that they receive. The Act applies to discharges of indebtedness that occur on or after January 1, 2007 and before January 1, 2010. Under the previous law, if the value of one’s home declined, and their bank or lender forgave a portion of their home loan, the tax code treated the amount forgiven as income that could be taxed.

Let’s look at the following example… John Smith bought a $250,000 home in 2004, taking out a $200,000 loan in the form of a 3-year ARM. By the end of 2007 the value of his home dropped to $175,000, and his interest rate adjusted upward thereby causing his monthly home loan payments to skyrocket. After having lived in his principal residence for three out of the past five years, recognizing that he could no longer afford to make his payments, and realizing that he is inhibited from refinancing, Mr. Smith is faced with some options; two of the most feasible options being (a) sell the home by way of a “short-sale,” or (b) allow the lender to foreclose.

Regardless of which option Mr. Smith selects, he is likely to realize forgiven debt; that forgiven debt being the difference in what he owes (i.e. ~$200,000) and what the lender collects from either the short-sale or Trustee’s sale (i.e. foreclosure sale). Given that Mr. Smith lived in his home for two out of the past five years, it likely constitutes a qualified principal residence for purposes of the Act. As such, any debt forgiveness realized by Mr. Smith (as evidenced by IRS Form 1099), will not treated as “income” for purposes of determining his annual gross income for the respective tax year.

Return to Articles

  • Recent Articles

    • The Nuts & Bolts of Estate Planning

    • Basics of Commercial Leases

    • Arrests and Interrogations FAQ

    • To Sue or Not to Sue

    • Statutes of Limitations & Construction Litigation

    • Divorce Mediation FAQ

    • Arizona Landlord Tenant Law

    • Prenuptial Agreements Overview

    • Most Recent Child Support Calculator (2018-2019)

    • An Overview of Chaper 13 Bankruptcy

  • Testimonials

    • Testimonial #1: "We have been using Anthem Law's services for many years. They have helped us purchase a company, create a living trust and create legal documents. Anthem Law has been a great resource for our legal needs and we will continue to use them in the future."

      Steve Cahow, Netech Global, LLC
    • Testimonial #2: "I highly recommend Anthem Law."

      Brack J
    • Testimonial #3: "Anthem Law has excellent attorneys. They're trustworthy, always reliable, and provide very enlightened and informative advice."

      Josh Dolin, Tempo Creative
    • Testimonial #4: "Anthem Law helped me through a difficult contract negotiation for my business. Their attention to detail was extremely important. It allowed me to make the correct decisions throughout the entire process. I have used them for various legal needs and found them to be thorough and professional."

      Tim Maki, Insurance Agent
    • Testimonial #5: "I am sincerely thankful, and grateful, for the guidance and support I received from Anthem Law as I went through the emotional stress and pain that comes with going through a divorce. They were so genuine and kind; their advice was both realistic and reassuring- a comfort when I thought I couldn't make it through this situation."

      Tammy H.
    • Testimonial #6: "I engaged the services of Anthem Law when my wife and I separated and filed for divorce. The firm handled the case with true professionalism and empathy for my situation. My wife and I reconciled; a result the attorneys were pleased to hear. Two years later my wife and I have again filed for divorce. I again engaged Anthem Law and have again experienced the professionalism and empathy of the firm. I would highly recommend Anthem Law for your legal needs."

      Donald H.
    • Testimonial #7: "Sam Crump is more than just our family's attorney, he is a trusted business advisor and friend. I could not recommend someone more than I do Sam."

      Mike O’Shaughnessy, Pres. – Guardian Pro
  • Contact Us

    Anthem Law

    42104 N. Venture Drive, Suite D126
    Anthem, Arizona 85086

    Phone: 623-551-5457
    Facsimile: 623-551-5458

Get Social
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
  • Articles
  • Contact Us
Copyright © 2019 Anthem Law